What is an MVP (minimum viable product)?
A minimum viable product (MVP) is the first, deliberately lean version of a product that contains only the most important functions. It serves to test an idea on the market with minimal effort and to develop it further based on real feedback.
Also known as: minimum viable product · first product version · MVP approach
Where an MVP is used
An MVP reduces a product to the core needed to prove its central value. Instead of investing months in a full feature set, teams go live early with a working version and learn from real usage which functions are actually needed.
This approach lowers the risk of misguided investment because assumptions are validated early. In mid-sized companies it is especially suitable for quickly testing new digital offerings without committing a large budget from the start – often as the first run in the SDLC.
A practical example
A company wants to offer a platform for digital claims reporting. Instead of building every conceivable function right away, the MVP starts with the core flow: report a claim, track its status, receive a confirmation. After going live, usage data and feedback show which extensions – such as reporting or partner connectivity – make sense next.
How it relates & how smiit uses it
An MVP should not be confused with an unfinished or faulty product: it is deliberately small, yet stable and usable. It forms the starting point for further development along the SDLC and often grows later into a full-fledged digital platform. smiit chose exactly this path for Claimity AG and brought a working SaaS platform into production on Microsoft Azure in just six weeks – with a multi-tenant architecture, Azure App Service, Azure Database for PostgreSQL and REST APIs, GDPR-compliant and designed to be extensible from the start.
Common mistakes & misconceptions
- An MVP is often misunderstood as an unfinished or low-quality product, when it should be a working version with real user value that deliberately tests an assumption.
- Many equate the MVP with the first release version, although its actual purpose is to achieve maximum learning about the market with minimal effort.
- It is frequently assumed that an MVP packs in as many features as possible at reduced quality, whereas it is really about a few features that cleanly deliver the core value.
Frequently asked questions
Is an MVP simply an unfinished version?
No. An MVP is deliberately reduced to the most important functions, yet stable and ready for real users. The goal is not a half-finished product but a usable core for learning.
How quickly can an MVP be delivered?
That depends on scope, but precisely the focus on the core makes short timeframes possible. For Claimity AG, for example, smiit delivered a production SaaS platform on Azure in six weeks.
What is the difference between an MVP and a prototype?
A prototype usually only serves to illustrate an idea and is often discarded afterwards. An MVP, by contrast, is a real, usable product that is put on the market from the start and extended step by step.
How do you decide which functions belong in the MVP?
The decisive factor is the central assumption to be validated: which functions are needed for users to experience the core value? Anything that does not support this core flow is deliberately deferred to later iterations.
What happens to an MVP after the market test?
Based on the insights gained, the product is developed further in a targeted way — functions that prove their worth are expanded, less relevant ones are dropped. This way the MVP grows iteratively into a full-fledged solution along the SDLC.
Related terms
Sources & further reading
Want to put this topic to work in your company?
Updated · Back to the glossary